Clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during the COVID-19 era: a single center, observational study.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol (CFDC) in comparison with colistin (COL) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bloodstream infections (BSI). MATERIALS/METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including adults with CRAB-BSI. Outcomes were mortality, clinical cure and adverse events during therapy. The average treatment effect of CFDC compared to COL was weighted with the inverse-probability treatment weight (IPTW). RESULTS: Overall, 104 patients were included (50 CFDC, 54 COL), median age 66.5 years, median Charlson Comorbidity Index 5, septic shock in 33.6% of patients. Primary BSI accounted for 43.3% of cases, followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (26%), catheter-related BSI (20.2%) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (9.6%). Although not significantly, mortality at all time points was lower for CFDC than COL, while clinical cure was higher in CFDC than COL (66% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.027). Adverse events were more frequent in COL than CFDC-group (38.8% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001), primarily attributed to acute kidney injury (AKI) in the COL group. Patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP treated with CFDC had a significant lower 30-d mortality and higher clinical cure than COL (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0008, respectively). Increment of CCI (p = 0.005), ICU (p = 0.025), SARS-CoV2 (p = 0.006) and ECMO (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with 30-d mortality, while receiving CFDC was not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: CFDC could represent an effective and safe treatment option for CRAB BSI, especially in patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP and frail patients where the risk of acute renal failure during therapy should be avoided.

The long-term effect on surgery-free survival of biological compared to conventional therapy in Crohn's disease in real world-data: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of biological drugs has led to great expectations and growing optimism in the possibility that this new therapeutic strategy could favourably change the natural history of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and, in particular, that it could lead to a significant reduction in surgery in the short and long term. This study aims to assess the impact of biological versus conventional therapy on surgery-free survival time (from the diagnosis to the first bowel resection) and on the overall risk of surgery in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who were never with the surgical option. METHODS: This is a retrospective, double-arm study including CD patients treated with either biological or conventional therapy (mesalamine, immunomodulators, antibiotics, or steroids). All CD patients admitted at the GI Unit of the S. Salvatore Hospital (L'Aquila. Italy) and treated with biological therapy since 1998 were included in the biological arm. Data concerning the CD patients receiving a conventional therapy were retrospectively collected from our database. These patients were divided into a pre-1998 and post-1998 group. Our primary outcome was the evaluation of the surgery-free survival since CD diagnosis to the first bowel resection. Surgery-free time and event incidence rates were calculated and compared among all groups, both in the original population and in the propensity-matched population. RESULTS: Two hundred three CD patients (49 biological, 93 conventional post-1998, 61 conventional pre-1998) were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimate shows that patients in the biological arm had a longer surgery-free survival compared to those in the conventional arm (p = 0.03). However, after propensity matching analysis, conducted on 143 patients, no significant difference was found in surgery-free survival (p = 0.3). A sub-group analysis showed shorter surgery-free survival in patients on conventional therapy in the pre-biologic era only (p = 0.02; Hazard Ratio 2.9; CI 1.01-8.54) while no significant difference was found between the biologic and conventional post-biologic groups (p = 0.15; Hazard Ratio 2.1; CI 0.69-6.44). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the introduction of biological therapy has only a slight impact on the eventual occurrence of surgery in CD patients over a long observation period. Nevertheless, biological therapy appears to delay the first intestinal resection.

The connection between diverticulosis and colonic superficial neoplastic lesions in patients who underwent screening colonoscopy.

PURPOSE: If could be a potential pathophysiological connection between colonic diverticula and colonic superficial neoplastic lesions, beyond the shared risk factors, has been a subject of debate in the last years. This study tries to evaluate the association between diverticulosis and colonic neoplastic lesions. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including asymptomatic patients who underwent a screening colonoscopy (patients with a positive fecal occult blood test under the regional program of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening), surveillance after polypectomy resection, or familiarity (first-degree relatives) between 2020 and 2021 to evaluate the association between diverticula and colonic polyps. A multivariate analysis with multiple logistic regression and odds ratio (OR) to study the independent association between adenomas and adenocarcinomas was performed. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred one patients were included. A statistically significant association between adenomas or CRC alone and colonic diverticula was found (p = 0.045). On a multivariate analysis of demographic (age, gender) and clinical parameters (familiarity for diverticula and adenoma/CRC), only age was significantly associated with the development of colorectal adenomas or cancer (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a statistically significant association between diverticula and colonic adenomas. However, it is impossible to establish a cause-effect relationship due to the intrinsic characteristics of this study design. A study with a prospective design including both patients with diverticulosis and without colonic diverticula aimed at establishing the incidence of adenoma and CRC could help to answer this relevant clinical question, since a potential association could indicate the need for closer endoscopic surveillance.

Is mesalazine treatment effective in the prevention of diverticulitis? A review.

Diverticulitis is the most severe form of Diverticular disease (DD). An effective treatment strategy for its prevention has not yet been defined. This review aimed to provide a viewpoint on the role of mesalazine, also note as 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), in the prevention of diverticulitis. A systematic electronic search of relevant articles was performed using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), open trials, and retrospective studies, published between January 1999 and January 2020, were identified. Twelve eligible studies that analyzed primary or secondary outcomes of diverticulitis were included. The population included patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD), or patients with a history of diverticulitis. All studies compared 5-ASA to placebo, rifaximin, or other treatments. Two studies, including 359 patients, assessed the efficacy of 5-ASA in preventing the first appearance of diverticulitis in patients with SUDD. Of these, one showed that 5-ASA was effective, and one did not. Ten studies, including 2.995 patients, assessed the efficacy of 5-ASA treatment in preventing the recurrence of diverticulitis in patients with a history of diverticulitis. Four studies showed that 5-ASA had a certain degree of efficacy. All four RCTs demonstrated that 5-ASA did not significantly reduce the rate of diverticulitis recurrence. In a retrospective trial, 5-ASA was less effective than rifaximin in preventing diverticulitis recurrence. In an open trial, there was no difference between 5-ASA and probiotic treatment. Overall, there is currently conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of 5-ASA treatment in the prevention of diverticulitis and further RCTs are needed.

Mesalazine vanishing time from rectal mucosa following its topical administration.

To investigate how long and how much Mesalazine (M) is available inside the rectal mucosa following its topical instillation, in patients (pts) with Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Two rectal biopsies for M concentration were obtained from 45 UC pts in clinical remission and on oral M treatment (OT), before a 4g enema randomly given to consentient pts every day (Group A, 15 pts), every 2 days (Group B, 15 pts) and every 3 days (Group C, 15 pts). Two additional biopsies were taken 1, 2 and 3 days after the last enema in group A, B and C respectively, at least 10 days later. All biopsies were immediately frozen at -80°C for later assay by means of high-performance light chromatography (HPLC). Data were analyzed using Student's t-test. Mean values±standard deviation of M mucosal concentration (ng/mg of tissue) were 1.32±1.41, 56.1±39.2, 9.65±6.60, and 6.39±5.03 in pts receiving OT alone, groups A, B and C, respectively. Values in Group A were statistically higher (p<0.001) than those in Groups B and C while no differences were found between Groups B and C. Values of OT were lower than groups A, B and C. M mucosal concentration rapidly decreases 2 days after a 4g enema, but after three days is still higher than OT alone. These results may provide data which would be useful to plan topical therapy and improve adherence to treatment.

Clinical course of Crohn's disease first diagnosed at surgery for acute abdomen.

BACKGROUND: The severity of clinical activity of Crohn's disease is high during the first year after diagnosis and decreases thereafter. Approximately 50% of patients require steroids and immunosuppressants and 75% need surgery during their lifetime. The clinical course of patients with Crohn's disease first diagnosed at surgery has never been investigated. AIM: To assess the clinical course of Crohn's disease first diagnosed at surgery for acute abdomen and to evaluate the need for medical and surgical treatment in this subset of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hospital clinical records of 490 consecutive Crohn's disease patients were reviewed. Patients were classified according to the Vienna criteria. Sex, extraintestinal manifestations, family history of inflammatory bowel diseases, appendectomy, smoking habit and medical/surgical treatments performed during the follow-up period were assessed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kaplan-Meier survival method and Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Of the 490 Crohn's disease patients, 115 had diagnosis of Crohn's disease at surgery for acute abdomen (Group A) and 375 by conventional clinical, radiological, endoscopic and histologic criteria (Group B). Patients in Group A showed a low risk of further surgery (Log Rank test p<0.001) and a longer time interval between diagnosis and first operation compared to Group B (10.8 years vs. 5.8 years, p<0.01, respectively). Furthermore, patients in Group A used less steroids and immunosuppressants (OR 0.3, p<0.0001; OR 0.6, p<0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Crohn's disease patients first diagnosed at surgery for acute abdomen showed a low risk for reintervention and less use of steroids and immunosuppressants during follow-up than those not operated upon at diagnosis. Early surgery may represent a valid approach in the initial management of patients with Crohn's disease, at least in the subset of patients with ileal and complicated disease.

Early versus late surgery for ileo-caecal Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is almost inevitable in Crohn's disease. Surgery is usually performed for refractory or complicated disease: no studies appear to have been carried out, so far, to evaluate the potential benefits of performing surgery early in the course of the disease. AIM: To compare the long-term course of Crohn's disease following ileo-caecal resection performed at the time of diagnosis (early surgery) or during the course of the disease (late surgery). Patients and methods Overall 207 patients with ileo-caecal Crohn's disease at their first resection were reviewed: 83 patients underwent surgery at the time of diagnosis (early surgery), while 124 underwent surgery 54.2 months (range 1-438) after diagnosis (late surgery). The mean follow-up after surgery was 147 months (range 12-534). The primary endpoint was clinical recurrence, defined as need for corticosteroids for symptomatic disease in the presence of endoscopic and/or radiologic recurrence. Secondary endpoints were need for immunosuppressants and surgical recurrence. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kaplan-Meier survival method and Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Within 10 years after surgery, the cumulative probability of clinical recurrence was significantly lower in the early surgery group (Log Rank test P = 0.01). A trend was observed regarding the need for immunosuppressants (P = 0.05). No difference was observed regarding surgical recurrence. At multivariate analysis, early surgery was the only independent variable associated with a reduced risk of clinical recurrence (Hazard ratio, HR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.92, P = 0.02), but not with need for immunosuppressants and surgical recurrence (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.20 to 1.30, P = 0.15; HR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.33 to 1.35, P = 0.25, respectively). CONCLUSION: Early surgery prolongs clinical remission compared to surgery performed during the course of the disease, but the natural history of disease is not modified.

Infliximab in severe ulcerative colitis: short-term results of different infusion regimens and long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Severe ulcerative colitis is a life-threatening disorder, despite i.v. glucocorticoids treatment. Infliximab has been proposed as a safe rescue therapy. AIM: To evaluate short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of infliximab in severe refractory ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with severe ulcerative colitis (i.v. glucocorticoids treatment-refractory) were treated with infliximab in 10 Italian Gastroenterology Units. Patients underwent one or more infusions according to the choice of treating physicians. Short-term outcome was colectomy/death 2 months after the first infusion. Long-term outcome was survival free from colectomy. Safety data were recorded. RESULTS: Twelve patients (15%) underwent colectomy within 2 months. One died of Legionella pneumophila infection 12 days after infliximab. Early colectomy rates were higher in patients receiving one infusion (9/26), compared with those receiving two/more infusions (3/57, P = 0.001, OR = 9.53). Seventy patients who survived colectomy and did not experience any fatal complications were followed-up for a median time of 23 months; 58 patients avoided colectomy during the follow-up. Forty-two patients were maintained on immunosuppressive drugs. No clinical features were associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is an effective and relatively safe therapy to avoid colectomy and maintain long-term remission for patients with severe refractory ulcerative colitis. In the short term, two or more infusions seem to be more effective than one single infusion.

Use of a 99mTc labeled anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody in Crohn's disease: in vitro and in vivo studies.

AIM: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by a cellular-mediated immune response driven by cytokines secreted mainly by T helper 1 cells (Th1). In active phases of the disease, an increased production and release of tumor necrosis factor a (TNFalpha) by macrophages and monocytes of the lamina propria has been described. The aim of this study was to detect the presence of TNFalpha within the gut mucosa in patients with active CD by using (99m)Tc-labelled chimeric human/mouse monoclonal antibody anti-TNFalpha (Infliximab, Remicade). METHODS: Infliximab has been labeled with (99m)Tc after reduction of disulfide bound by 2-ME method. In vitro binding assay and biodistribution in animal of [(99m)Tc]Infliximab has been performed to evaluate the retention of its biological activity. Ten patients with active CD refractory to conventional medical therapies were studied. Images of the abdomen were acquired at 6 to 20 h after i.v. injection of about 10 mCi of [(99m)Tc]Infliximab and a week later, all patients were also studied with [(99m)Tc]HMPAO-labeled autologous white blood cells (WBC). RESULTS: A product with high labeling efficiency (>95%) and stability has been obtained. In vitro tests with stimulated T-cells expressing TNFalphalpha indicated that [(99m)Tc] Infliximab retains its binding activity to cell bound TNFalpha as compared to unlabelled Infliximab. The degree of [(99m)Tc]Infliximab uptake by the inflamed bowel evaluated at 20 h postinjection was much less than that seen with labeled WBC and with a different distribution. Three of these patients received anti-TNFalpha (Infliximab) for therapeutic purposes with good clinical results despite the scintigraphy with (99m)Tc-Infliximab was negative in 2 of them. CONCLUSION: Scintigraphy with [(99m)Tc]Infliximab shows the presence of little TNFalpha in the affected bowel of patients with active CD. Therefore, the clinical benefit that patients have from Infliximab therapy is unlikely the consequence of a local a reduction of TNFalpha and the mechanism of action of Infliximab, in therapeutic doses, deserves further investigations.

Mucosal features and granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis in steroid-dependent/refractory ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Mucosa-infiltrated granulocyte neutrophils are an early characteristic of inflammation and the main histological feature of active ulcerative colitis. Mucosal healing has recently been indicated as an important tool in the evaluation of response to treatment. While several studies have stressed the efficacy of granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis in inducing clinical remission in active ulcerative colitis, few data are available on mucosal features. AIM: Aim of this study was to assess the effects of granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis on clinical and mucosal features in patients with ulcerative colitis, dependent upon or refractory to steroids. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From April 2004 to April 2005, 12 patients (5 females, 7 males, mean age 49 years, range 33-71 years), with mild-moderate ulcerative colitis (six left colitis, six pancolitis) dependent/refractory upon steroids were enrolled. Each patient was treated for a 5-week period with five cycles of granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis. Patients were evaluated at baseline and 1 week after the last apheresis by means of Global Physician Assessment, quality of life features, laboratory tests (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, full blood count, faecal calprotectine), endoscopy and histology. RESULTS: At week 6 of follow-up, complete mucosal healing was observed in 3 out of 12 patients, partial mucosal healing in 8 patients and no change in 1 patient. Clinical response was complete in 8 out of 12 patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis induces an improvement both in clinical and mucosal lesions in steroid-dependent/refractory ulcerative colitis. Of note, the reduction in granulocyte infiltration and the improvement in mucosal lesions are accompanied by a reduction in faecal calprotectine.

Two synchronous adenocarcinomas of the small bowel in a patient with undiagnosed Crohn's disease of the terminal ileum.

A small but significant excess of deaths for tumors of the digestive system has been described in Crohn's disease. In a study analyzing all cancers of the small intestine within a defined population, Crohn's disease was the major underlying factor for cancer of the small intestine. Areas of the small intestine containing strictures are unusually prone to malignant transformation. We report the rare case of a patient in whom surgery for intestinal occlusion disclosed Crohn's disease of the distal ileum complicated by two adenocarcinomas arising within distinct areas of the inflamed bowel.

Seasonal variations in onset of symptoms in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal variations in onset of symptoms have been reported in ulcerative colitis but not in Crohn's disease. AIM.: To investigate whether our inflammatory bowel diseases patients presented seasonal variations in onset of symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases established between 1995 and May 2004, and consecutively observed from June 2003 to May 2004, were included in the study. Onset of symptoms (year, season and month) was recorded. Expected onsets with a uniform distribution during the year were calculated and compared to observed onsets. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: chi-square test, odds ratio (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: Overall 425 inflammatory bowel diseases patients were enrolled. Onset of symptoms (year and season) was established in 353/425 patients (83%; 150 Crohn's disease; 203 ulcerative colitis). Onset of symptoms in inflammatory bowel diseases patients as a whole occurred more frequently in spring-summer compared to autumn-winter (odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.87; p<0.03). This variation was observed in Crohn's disease (odds ratio 1.59; 95% confidence interval 1.00-2.51; p<0.05) and a similar trend, although not significant, was observed in ulcerative colitis (odds ratio 1.27; 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.88; p=0.27). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that onset of Crohn's disease symptoms occurred more frequently during spring-summer. A similar trend was observed in ulcerative colitis. Environmental factors, such as associated infections, smoking, use of drugs and seasonal changes in immune function may be responsible for triggering the clinical onset of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Increased risk of breast cancer in first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients. An IG-IBD study.

BACKGROUND: Increased rates of colorectal cancer have been reported in patients with ulcerative colitis as well as with Crohn's colitis. This risk could be the result of shared genetic susceptibility and could be co-inherited rather than being just secondary to a long-standing, extensive mucosal inflammation. AIM: To assess the prevalence of all malignancies in first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients in order to establish whether any association exists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 632 outpatients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease and 632 control subjects were recruited. Information concerning the presence of malignancies was collected in 3,292 first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients and in 3,303 first-degree relatives of controls. RESULTS: Two hundred and fourteen (6.5%) subjects were found to be affected by malignancy in the first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients and 180 (5.5%) in the first-degree relatives of controls. Forty-seven (7.4%) of Crohn's disease patients had a first-degree relative with IBD, but none of them had cancer. The frequency of extra-intestinal malignancies was higher in first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients than in those of controls (p=0.011). Frequency of breast cancer in female relatives of Crohn's disease patients, mainly in mothers, was two-fold higher than that in controls (0.91% versus 0.42%; odds ratio=2.16; 95% confidence interval=1.14-4.08; p=0.015). The presence of breast cancer showed no association with any specific phenotype of disease in Crohn's patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results did not corroborate the hypothesis about a common genetic susceptibility between Crohn's disease and colorectal cancer. An unexpected finding was the more frequent occurrence of extra-digestive malignancies. The prevalence of breast cancer in first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients, in particular the mothers, was more than double than in those of controls. This association, if confirmed, would suggest that there may exist common genetic and/or environmental factors for Crohn's disease and breast cancer.

Appropriateness of immunosuppressive drugs in inflammatory bowel diseases assessed by RAND method: Italian Group for IBD (IG-IBD) position statement.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the explosion of biological therapies, the old immunosuppressants continue to play a pivotal role in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases. AIM: To assess the appropriateness of immunosuppressants-azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, cyclosporine A, tacrolimus (FK506), mycophenolate mofetil and thalidomide-in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease by using RAND/University of California Appropriateness Method. METHODS: The RAND method consists of a combination of evidence from the literature and experts' opinions. Appropriateness has been defined to mean that the expected health benefit exceeds the expected negative consequences by a sufficiently wide margin. A panel of 10 experts from the Italian Group for Inflammatory Bowel Disease has rated, in two rounds, on a scale from 1 to 9, the appropriateness of each indication selected by the Promoter Centre, on the basis of their own clinical experience. An indication was considered appropriate if the median of the panelists' ratings fell within the area 7-9, inappropriate in the area 1-3 and uncertain in the area 4-6. A total of 2781 indications were grouped into 13 categories (mild to moderate Crohn's disease; severe Crohn's disease; fistulizing Crohn's disease; steroid-dependant and -resistant Crohn's disease; maintenance of remission induced by medical treatment in Crohn's disease; maintenance of remission induced by surgery in Crohn's disease; mild to moderate ulcerative colitis; severe ulcerative colitis; steroid-dependant and -resistant ulcerative colitis; maintenance of remission induced by medical treatment in ulcerative colitis; extra-intestinal manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease; pregnancy and inflammatory bowel disease; azathioprine-resistant or -intolerant inflammatory bowel disease patients). RESULTS: Of the 2781 scenarios, 212 (7.6%) were rated appropriate, 645 (23.2%) uncertain and 1924 (69.2%) inappropriate. The most relevant results were: in steroid-dependant or -resistant Crohn's disease, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate were defined as appropriate in 25 (86.2%) and 14 (48.3%) of the 29 scenarios respectively; in Crohn's disease, azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine were defined as appropriate combined with Infliximab (bridge therapy); in steroid-dependant or -resistant ulcerative colitis, azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine were defined as appropriate in 45 (77.6%) out of 58 scenarios, while methotrexate was defined appropriate only after previous azathioprine failure; in severe ulcerative colitis, cyclosporine A was defined as appropriate only after previous failure with steroids; in azathioprine-intolerant or -resistant inflammatory bowel disease patients, methotrexate was appropriate in 20 (66.7%) out of 30 scenarios; it is inappropriate to stop azathioprine treatment before conception in the presence of active disease. The use of FK506, mycophenolate mofetil and Thalidomide resulted as inappropriate or uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study show that only azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate are appropriate in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Cyclosporine A was found to be appropriate only in severe ulcerative colitis after the failure of steroids. FK506, mycophenolate mofetil and Thalidomide resulted as inappropriate but experience with these agents is somewhat limited.

Infliximab in the treatment of Crohn's disease: predictors of response in an Italian multicentric open study.

BACKGROUND: Almost 20% of patients with active Crohn's disease are refractory to conventional therapy. Infliximab is a treatment of proven efficacy in this group of patients and it is not clear which variables predict a good response. AIMS.: To evaluate the role of infliximab looking at the predictors of response in a large series of patients with Crohn's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred and seventy-three patients with luminal refractory Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)>220-400) (312 patients) or with fistulising disease (190 patients) or both of them (71 patients) were treated with a dose of 5 mg/kg in 12 Italian referral centres. The primary endpoints of the study were clinical response and clinical remission for luminal refractory and fistulising disease. We evaluated at univariable and multivariable analysis the following variables: number of infusions, sex, age at diagnosis, smoking habit, site of disease, previous surgery, extraintestinal manifestations and concomitant therapies, and type of fistulas. RESULTS: Patients with luminal refractory disease: 322 patients (84.1%) had a clinical response and 228 (59.5%) reached clinical remission. Patients with fistulising disease: 187 patients (72%) had a reduction of 50% of the number of fistulas and in 107 (41%) a total closure of fistulas was observed. For luminal disease, single infusion (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.86) and previous surgery (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.93) predicted a worse response for fistulising disease. Other fistulas responded worse than perianal fistulas (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.303-1.097). CONCLUSION: In Crohn's disease infliximab is effective in luminal refractory and in fistulising disease. A single infusion and previous surgery predicted a worse response in luminal disease whereas perianal fistulas predicted a better response than other type of fistulas.

Efficacy of conventional immunosuppressive drugs in IBD.

The introduction and rapid diffusion of biological agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease had led us to believe that the old immunosuppressive drugs were destined to disappear. However, despite a decade of clinical experience in the use of biological agents, the old immunosuppressive drugs continue to play a pivotal role in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Various factors may account for this change of view. Aim of the present review was to summarise key information currently available regarding the use of immunosuppressive drugs in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Infliximab in spondyloarthropathy associated with Crohn's disease: an open study on the efficacy of inducing and maintaining remission of musculoskeletal and gut manifestations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) monoclonal antibody (infliximab) in the treatment of spondyloarthropathy (SpA) associated with active and inactive Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Twenty four patients with SpA associated with active or inactive CD (16 active, 8 quiescent) were treated with anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody (infliximab) with repeated infusions for a period of 12-18 months. The treatment aimed at ameliorating the general musculoskeletal and spinal pain, controlling peripheral arthritis and enthesitis, decreasing the BASDAI score, modifying acute phase reactants, and reducing CD activity. RESULTS: Infliximab improved both gastrointestinal (p<0.01) and overall articular symptoms (BASDAI, p<0.01; general musculoskeletal and spinal pain, p<0.01; peripheral arthritis, p<0.01) in patients with active CD. Additionally, infliximab effectively controlled not only axial involvement and peripheral arthritis but also enthesitis (p<0.01) and prevented inflammatory bowel disease reactivation in patients with inactive CD and low inflammatory markers. Amelioration of gut and musculoskeletal involvement persisted for up to 12 months. CONCLUSION: Infliximab may act on the inflammation of entheses and of periarticular structures, which usually does not cause a change in the haematological markers that are the main indicators of pain and joint ankylosis in SpA. Infliximab induces and maintains remission of CD while at the same time treating active and severe SpA, suggesting that it should be the preferred drug for the treatment of active and severe SpA associated with active or quiescent CD.